Legal Opinion

In re Yeoman

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 1928PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRodenbeck, J.

The applicant was arrested in December, 1927, and was brought before the City Court, Criminal Branch, on the charge of having violated section 5 of the rules and regulations for use districts of the city planning bureau. The penalties for violating the rules and regulations of the superintendent of city planning were prescribed by section 295 of the charter of the city of Rochester (Laws of 1907, chap. 755, as added by Laws of 1921, chap. 524). Section 5 of the rules and regulations was repealed, going into effect on January 1,1928. This repeal did not operate to bar the applicant’s…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pleasant Grove City v. LindsayUtah Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Rutherford v. SwinkTennessee Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Leach v. KenyonNew York Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Bell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
  3. Bell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
  4. Chiodo v. RiceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API