Legal Opinion

In re Vamos

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 22, 1935PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PATTERSON, District Judge.

The bankrupt applied for his discharge. Bondy, a creditor, filed specifications in opposition. There were three specifications: First, that the bankrupt had made false oath in failing to list as an asset beneficial ownership in certain shares of stock; second, that he had concealed the ownership of such shares from the trustee in bankruptcy; third, that he had obtained money by false statement in writing respecting his financial condition. The referee to whom the case was sent has reported that the third specification is sustained by the proof. He made no finding as…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Johnston v. JohnstonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1933
  2. Levy v. Industrial Finance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. Robinson v. J. R. Williston & Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1920
  4. In Re LittleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
  5. In Re SchefflerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Albinak v. KuhnCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1945
  2. Peter Cottrell Scott v. Norma SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
  3. Matter of VamosCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API