Legal Opinion

Travelers Cas. Insurance v. Karns - (

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided October 5, 2018No. 117128PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Atcheson, J.:

*303 *389 Regular participants in government bureaucracies sometimes adopt informalities that commonly reduce the friction those processes would generate if they functioned strictly as designed. The expedients mostly work unless they run up against an eccentric situation or until someone calls attention to the actual design. We appear to face some combination of those circumstances in assessing how the Kansas Workers Compensation Act realigns financial responsibility among insurance companies when one insurer has paid benefits to an injured worker that should have been paid by another…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Webster v. FallSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Cooper Industries, Inc. v. Aviall Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  4. Casco v. Armour Swift-EckrichSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  5. Estate of Belden v. Brown CountyCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2011

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Green v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2019
  2. Hawkins v. Southwest Kansas Co-op Svc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API