Legal Opinion
Arkansas Pipe Trades Health and Welfare Fund v. Stiles Consulting Firm, LLC
District Court, C.D. California
Decided September 2, 2025No. 8:24-cv-01894Unknown
1Opinion
O 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 United States District Court 9 Central District of California 10 11 ARKANSAS PIPE TRADES HEALTH Case № 8:24-cv-01894-ODW (KESx) AND WELFARE FUND et al., 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ 13 MOTION FOR DEFAULT v. 14 JUDGMENT [21] STILES CONSULTING FIRM, LLC et 15 al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 I. INTRODUCTION 19 Plaintiffs bring this action against Defendants for breach of a written collective 20 bargaining agreement and violation of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act 21 (“ERISA”) § 515, 29 U.S.C. § 1145. (Compl. ¶¶ 27–42, ECF No. 1.) Plaintiffs seek to 22 recover…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Gary R. Eitel v. William D. McCoolCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Alvera M. Aldabe v. Charles D. AldabeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Televideo Systems, Inc. K. Philip Hwang C. Gemma Hwang v. Fred P. Heidenthal, Individually and Dba South Harbor Investors and West Cliff SecuritiesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.