Legal Opinion · Dissent

Matter of Kowal v. DiNapoli

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 1, 2016No. 522576Published

1DissentLynch, J.

I respectfully dissent. As respondents acknowledge in their brief, and as this Court has previously explained, “[respondent] Comptroller draws a distinction between injuries received by a court officer as the result of an assault and injuries received as the result of an attempt to restrain a disruptive individual while performing the duties of a court officer. According to the Comptroller, the former constitutes a compensable accident, while the latter constitutes a risk inherent in the course of the court officer’s employment” (Matter of Ammann v New York State Comptroller, 13 AD3d 858, 858…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. McCambridge v. McGuireNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Kilbride v. New York State ComptrollerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  3. Berbenich v. ReganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  4. Claim of Rykala v. New York State ComptrollerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  5. Roberts v. DiNapoliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API