Legal Opinion
Allcity Insurance v. Fisch
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided August 8, 2006PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action for a judgment declaring that the plaintiff is not obligated to defend and indemnify the defendant Joseph Fisch in an underlying action entitled Crespo v Fisch, pending in the Supreme Court, Kings County, under index No. 43714/99, (1) the plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Schmidt, J.), dated May 26, 2005, as denied its motion for summary judgment declaring that it is not obligated to defend and indemnify Joseph Fisch in the underlying action and granted those branches of the separate cross motions of the defendants Emmanuel Crespo and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Seaboard Surety Co. v. Gillette Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Fitzpatrick v. American Honda Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Town of Massena v. Healthcare Underwriters Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
- Cepeda v. VarverisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- GA Insurance v. Naimberg Realty AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hillcrest Coatings, Inc. v. Colony Insurance Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Those Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London, Subscribing to Policies PGIARK07130-00 and PGIXS00556-00 v. DVO, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 2020