Legal Opinion

Dunham-Bush, Inc. v. Palkovic

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1973No. 9520PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MONTOYA, Justice.

Plaintiff-appellant Dunham-Bush, Inc., hereinafter called “Dunham-Bush,” brought suit against defendant-appellee A. J. Palkovic and A. J. Palkovic, d/b/a P & C Equipment, hereinafter referred to as “Palkovic,” to correct an alleged overpayment of compensation and to collect an amount owing on an open account.

Dunham-Bush’s complaint was filed December 10, 1968. On January 9, 1969, Palkovic filed an answer to the complaint and asserted a cross-claim against DunhamBush, alleging non-payment of earned commissions and that he needed DunhamBush’s records in order to properly…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Martin v. Leonard Motor-El PasoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1965
  2. State Ex Rel. Reynolds v. Molybdenum Corp. of AmericaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Independent Steel & Wire Co. v. New Mexico Cent. R.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Shillinglaw v. Owen Shillinglaw Fuel CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Albuquerque National Bank Ex Rel. Estate of Hegemann v. JohnsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1964

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Newsome v. FarerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Acme Cigarette Services, Inc. v. GallegosNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. Sewell v. WilsonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Summit Electric Supply Co. v. Rhodes & Salmon, P.C.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. Great American Insurance v. BrownNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1974

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API