State ex rel. Moose v. Frank
Supreme Court of Arkansas
,. Appeal from Pulaski Circuit Court, Third Division; O. W. Hendricks, Judge; statement by the court. The complaint in this cause alleged that appellees were engaged in the laundering business in the city of Little Rock, some of the appellees being corporations, others being a copartnership and still others the individual business of the proprietors of the defendant laundries mentioned in the complaint.
Read the full summary
,. Appeal from Pulaski Circuit Court, Third Division; O. W. Hendricks, Judge; statement by the court. The complaint in this cause alleged that appellees were engaged in the laundering business in the city of Little Rock, some of the appellees being corporations, others being a copartnership and still others the individual business of the proprietors of the defendant laundries mentioned in the complaint. It was alleged in the complaint that appellees, in violation of the anti-trust law, have agreed with each other to fix prices to be charged their customers and that they carried on their…
1Opinion of the Court
Smith, J.,
(after stating the facts). It is conceded by the State that an agreement to fix the price of laundering is not an agreement to fix the price of ‘1 any article of manufacture, mechanism or merchandise;” but it is contended that the facts here alleged constitute an agreement to fix the price of a commodity, convenience or repair. And it is not contended by the State that the business of laundering is included in the terms “any article or thing whatsoever.” This last contention could not be sustained, because if the business of laundering is not a commodity, convenience or repair, then…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Queen Insurance v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1893
- Lohse Patent Door Co. v. FuelleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908
- State ex rel. Star Publishing Co. v. Associated PressSupreme Court of Missouri · 1901
- Cleland v. AndersonNebraska Supreme Court · 1902
- Rohlf v. KasemeierSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. McClellanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1923
- Beard v. Board of Education of North Summit School Dist.Utah Supreme Court · 1932
- National League of Professional Baseball Clubs v. Federal Baseball Club of Baltimore, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1920
- Pellerin Laundry Mach. Sales Co. v. CheneySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963
- Carlton v. ManuelNevada Supreme Court · 1947
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.