Legal Opinion

Heidtmueller v. Louisville N. R. Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 17, 1924No. 6 Div. 736Published

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

The first appeal in this case is reported as L. & N. R. Co. v. Heidtmueller, 206 Ala. 29, 89 South. 191. Each count of the complaint as originally filed and as amended sought to recover punitive damages under section 2486 of the Code of 1907. Alabama Power Co. v. Stogner, 208 Ala. 666, 95 South. 151.

After the case was reversed and remanded to the circuit court, there was an attempt to conform to the holding in Mo. Pac. R. R. Co. v. Ault, 256 U. S. 554, 41 Sup. Ct. 593, 65 L. Ed. 1087. On motion of the railroad company the case was dismissed as to it, and James C. Davis, as Agent of the United…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Missouri Pacific Railroad v. AultSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. Southern Railway Co. v. BushSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
  3. Clinton Mining Co. v. BradfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  4. Louisville N. R. Co. v. HeidtmuellerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  5. Alabama Power Co. v. StognerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API