Legal Opinion

Deborah F. Theisen Individually v. Estate of Clayton C. Wilson A/K/A Cleo Wilson

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 2007No. 2005-SC-000769-DGUnknownCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Justice SCHRODER.

The primary question in this case is whether revival or substitution of parties is required by an heir to proceed in a case when the plaintiff in an action litigating title to real property dies prior to final judgment. We adjudge that in this ease revival (KRS 395.278) and substitution of parties (CR 25.01) was not required because the case was submitted for judgment prior to the death of the plaintiff. However, we remand for a preliminary determination of whether appellant had standing to proceed in the action after the death of the plaintiff.

In a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Winn v. First Bank of IrvingtonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1978
  2. Norfolk & W. Ry. Co. v. McCoyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1941
  3. Wallace v. WallaceCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  4. Murphy v. BlackburnCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
  5. Associated Electric Co. v. FitchCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1950

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Pennymac Loan Services, LLC v. Mark LylesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API