Legal Opinion
Royal Insurance v. Smatco Industries Inc.
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Decided August 15, 1996No. Civil Action 95-3316PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND REASONS
CLEMENT, District Judge.
Before the Court is defendant Smatco Industries Ine.’s Motion for Summary Judgment. Smatco Industries, Inc. (“Smatco Industries”) contends that it should not be held liable to plaintiff as a successor corporation to Smatco, Inc. (“Smatco”), the entity which allegedly manufactured the winch that injured plaintiffs insured. For the following reasons, defendant’s motion is DENIED.
Background
Summary judgment is appropriate where the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories and admissions on file, together with any affidavits, show that there is no…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- East River Steamship Corp. v. Transamerica Delaval Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Golden State Bottling Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Elbie Mozingo, Cross-Appellee v. Correct Manufacturing Corporation and G.W. Way, Correct Manufacturing Corporation, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- Chicago Truck Drivers, Helpers and Warehouse Workers Union (Independent) Pension Fund v. Tasemkin, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Bankr. L. Rep. P 69,858 in the Matter of Mooney Aircraft, Inc. And Mooney Corporation, Bankrupts. Mooney Aircraft Corp. v. Joyce L. FosterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bostick v. Schall's Brakes & Repairs, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- In re Louisiana Crawfish ProducersCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014
- Wall v. Calcasieu Parish Police JuryLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2002
- McAllister v. Air & Liquid Systems CorporationDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2020
- Willie Granger, Jr. v. Amerada Hess Corporation, eCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014