Legal Opinion

Boesel v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided January 8, 1954No. 22711_1PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEDINA, Circuit Judge.

On March 10, 1930, petitioner, a stockbroker and financial promoter, entered into an agreement with Frank P. Parish & Co. by the terms of which he agreed to subscribe for 5,000 shares of Missouri-Kansas Pipe Line Company (hereinafter referred to as Mokan) common stock at $25 per share, payment to be made in 36 equal installments, bearing interest at the rate of 6% per annum on any unpaid monthly balance due. The stock was not deliverable until the expiration of three years from the date of the agreement; and the seller was given the option, in the event of default by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Boehm v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Boehm v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
  3. Cass v. HelveringCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. 875 Park Avenue Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954
  2. United Dairy Farmers, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2000
  3. Harris v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API