Cadle Co. v. Estate of Weaver
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON REMAND
BARBER, Justice.
The Cadle Company seeks to recover on two promissory notes. The trial court held that appellant’s claims were barred by the four-year statute of limitations.
We affirm.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Weaver executed two promissory notes payable to the First National Bank of Irving. The first note was in the principal sum of $52,156.64. The second note was in the principal sum of $17,841.55. Weaver defaulted on his obligation to make payment under both notes.
In April 1986, the First National Bank of Irving was placed in receivership. On No- . vember 12, 1986,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Delaney v. University of HoustonTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Jackson v. ThweattTexas Supreme Court · 1994
- Cadle Co. v. Estate of WeaverTexas Supreme Court · 1994
- Forest Cove Property Owners Ass'n v. LightbodyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987
3Cited by10 opinions
- Geiselman v. Cramer Financial Group, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1997
- Carlin v. 3V INC., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1996
- General Financial Services, Inc. v. Practice Place, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1995
- Bosque Asset Corp. v. Greenberg, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2000
- Cadle Co. v. Henderson, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.