Linda Schiernbeck v. Clark Davis and Rosa Davis
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WATERS, District Judge.
Linda Schiernbeek appeals the district court’s 2 entry of summary judgment in favor of the Davises on the issue of whether the Davises had a common law and/or statutory duty to install a smoke detector. We conclude that no duty to provide a smoke detector exists in this case, and therefore, we affirm.
1. BACKGROUND
This action was brought by Linda Schiern-beck (“Schiernbeek”) against her former landlords, Clark and Rosa Davis (the “Davises”). In October of 1991, Schiernbeek and her now ex-husband, Merlin Schiern-beck, began leasing a house from the Davises. The…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Camfield Tires, Inc. v. Michelin Tire CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
- Rsbi Aerospace, Inc. v. Affiliated Fm Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- Holloway v. LockhartCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
- Shroades v. Rental Homes, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1981
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Richard Thorn and Pat Curran v. Sundstrand Aerospace CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Powell v. Dallas Morning News L.P.District Court, N.D. Texas · 2011
- Eckelkamp v. BesteDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2002
- Rivera v. TrujilloNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1999
- Arce v. Chicago Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2015
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.