Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Love v. Jones

Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County

Decided March 17, 1953No. 35292PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By BELL, J.

Two questions, other than the guilt of the defendant, have been raised;

First: Can a proceeding in bastardy be instituted and maintained in the name of the State of Ohio?

Second: Can the proceeding be instituted and maintained by the complainant while she is a minor?

By virtue of the provisions of the bastardy statutes, prior to 1953 the state was the only interested party, the only purpose of the proceeding being to provide for the maintenance and support of the bastard child. The proceeding was not for the benefit of the mother. The law at that time regarded both the mother…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Elmore v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  2. State ex rel. Yilek v. JehlikSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
  3. Hanna v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1877
  4. Dehler v. State ex rel. BierckIndiana Court of Appeals · 1899
  5. State ex rel. Bales v. BakerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wells v. FultonOhio Court of Appeals · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API