Legal Opinion

LK Operating, LLC v. Collection Group, LLC

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided June 19, 2012No. 29741-1-IIIPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.

¶1 — Rules of professional conduct have been used to prohibit lawyers from enforcing agreements with clients that lawyers were a party to. But those same rules have not been applied to support actions for legal malpractice or for equitable relief or damages based on a lawyer’s ethical lapses. Here, the court refused to enforce a business agreement between two limited liability companies (LLCs) after concluding that the lawyer representing the parties represented both sides at the same time and therefore violated Rule of Professional Conduct (RPC) 1.7 (prohibiting lawyers from representing…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Hizey v. CarpenterWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Adcox v. Children's Orthopedic Hospital & Medical CenterWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Eriks v. DenverWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Ellis v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Hubbard v. Spokane CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2002

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. LK Operating, LLC v. Collection Group, LLCWashington Supreme Court · 2014
  2. LK Operating, LLC v. Collection Grp., LLCWashington Supreme Court · 2014
  3. North Cascades Conservation Council v. United States Forest ServiceDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API