Legal Opinion
Mahoney v. Sharma
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 1, 1985PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Absent competent medical proof of the causal connection between the alleged negligence and the death of the original plaintiff, the granting of leave to amend the complaint constituted an improvident exercise of discretion (see, Fiorentino v Cobble Hill Nursing Home, 101 AD2d 825; Ortiz v Bono, 101 AD2d 812; Smith v Hellman, 57 AD2d 566; Wood v Southside Hosp., 45 AD2d 1052). Thompson, J. P., Bracken, O’Connor and Weinstein, JJ., concur.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Fiorentino v. Cobble Hill Nursing HomeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Ortiz v. BonoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Wood v. Southside HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
- Smith v. HellmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
3Cited by7 opinions
- McGuire v. SmallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Shapiro v. BeerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Feinberg v. Walter B. Cooke, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Ullrich v. Rocking Horse Ranch, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Artese v. Brooklyn Longshoremen's Medical CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.