Legal Opinion · Dissent

Estate of Rankin

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 21, 1979No. 276Published

1DissentEagen, Chief Justice

I emphatically dissent.

The majority today ignores the clear and unambiguous language of Section 316 of the Inheritance and Estate Tax Act of June 16, 1961, P.L. 373, art. III, as amended, 72 P.S. § 2485-316 (Supp.1979-80) [Hereinafter: 72 P.S. § -], violates fundamental principles of tax law by making 72 P.S. §316 dependent upon the practicalities confronting a particular person, and reaches a horrendous result which will foster much unnecessary litigation.

This appeal presents the question whether the amount of an employee’s contribution to a retirement plan, which he had a right to withdraw…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Abry Partners V, L.P. v. F & W Acquisition LLCCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2006
  2. Dorsey EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  3. Metropolitan Pittsburgh Nonprofit Housing Corp. v. Board of Property Assessment, Appeals & ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Huston EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  5. Estate of RavdinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API