Legal Opinion

30 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 752, prod.liab.rep.(cch)p 12,554 Lloyd D. King v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc., the Celotex Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided August 31, 1990No. 89-2640PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WISDOM, Circuit Judge:

Celotex Corporation appeals a judgment against it in favor of a number of plaintiffs 1 for injuries arising out of the plaintiffs’ exposure to the defendant’s asbestos-containing products. The plaintiffs were exposed to asbestos dust in the course of their employment by the defendants. After a ten-day jury trial, the jury awarded the plaintiffs $1,897,500 in compensatory damages. In apportioning the degree of responsibility for causing the injury, the jury held that Celotex, the only non-settling defendant, 2 was responsible to the extent of fifty-five percent. The jury…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Solem v. HelmSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Ingraham v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. The Boeing Company v. Daniel C. ShipmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  4. Browning-Ferris Industries of Vermont, Inc. v. Kelco Disposal, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Duncan v. Cessna Aircraft Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1984

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. MaloneTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Claude Cimino v. Raymark Industries, Inc., Pittsburgh Corning Corporation and Asbestos Corporation LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
  3. Fibreboard Corp. v. PoolCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
  4. Dunn v. HOVICCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  5. Bowden v. Caldor, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1998

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API