Legal Opinion

City of Bellevue Ex Rel. Vickery v. Stedman

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 21, 1941No. 28393PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBettman, J.

The appellants recognize the applicability to the facts here involved and the controlling force of the decision of this court in N. Y., C. & St. L. Rd. Co. v. Bucsi, 128 Ohio St., 134, 190 N. E., 562, 93 A. L. R., 632. By that decision this court held that although as a result of a grade crossing elimination or street improvement a claimant’s property was left in a cul-de-sac, nevertheless if reasonable access to the general street system of the city was preserved, no legal damage resulted to the claimant. The appellants here do not contend that their access northward along High street to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. New York, Chicago & St. Louis Rd. v. BucsiOhio Supreme Court · 1934

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re Appropriation for Hwy. Purposes of Land of WinkelmanOhio Court of Appeals · 1968
  2. In Re Appropriation of Easements for Highway PurposesOhio Court of Appeals · 1966
  3. State ex rel. Barman v. LukensRoss County Court of Common Pleas · 1964
  4. Babin v. City of AshlandOhio Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Bacich v. Board of ControlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API