Legal Opinion
Thornburg v. Port of Portland
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided June 22, 1966PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGoodwin, J.
This is the second appeal arising out of Mrs. Thorn-burg’s claim in “inverse condemnation” for a taking alleged to have been accomplished by the Port of Portland. See Thornburg v. Port of Portland, 233 Or 178, 376 P2d 100 (1963). Mrs. Thornburg appears individually and as executrix. We shall refer to the plaintiff in the singular.
Plaintiff introduced evidence in support of her allegations that the landing and take-off patterns of the Portland International Airport during the years in question constituted a nuisance. To prevail it was necessary to prove a substantial interference with the use…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Thornburg v. Port of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1962
- Martin v. Port of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1964
- Gossett v. SimonsonOregon Supreme Court · 1966
- Walker v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Taylor v. LawrenceOregon Supreme Court · 1961
3Cited by27 opinions
- Highline School District No. 401 v. Port of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1976
- Amfac Foods, Inc. v. International Systems & Controls Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1982
- Alevizos v. Metropolitan Air. Com'n of Mpls. & St. P.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- City of Austin v. Travis County Landfill Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
- Rogers v. Meridian Park HospitalOregon Supreme Court · 1989
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.