Legal Opinion

People v. Bridgewater

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 29, 2009No. 105075PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kilbride

Chief Justice Fitzgerald and Justices Thomas, Gar-man, Karmeier, and Burke concurred in the judgment and opinion.

Justice Freeman dissented, with opinion.

OPINION

Defendant Lavar Bridgewater was charged with aggravated unlawful use of a weapon (720 ILCS 5/24— 1.6(a)(1), (a)(3)(B) (West 2004)). He filed a motion to suppress evidence seized in a search of his vehicle. The circuit court of Will County granted defendant’s motion, but the appellate court reversed, holding the search was justified as a search incident to arrest. 375 Ill. App. 3d 414.

We allowed defendant’s petition for leave to appeal.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. New York v. BeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Arizona v. GantSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. Thornton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. People v. CreganIllinois Supreme Court · 2014
  2. People v. EvansCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  3. People v. LandAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
  4. People v. BonillaIllinois Supreme Court · 2019
  5. People v. ThomasAppellate Court of Illinois · 2014

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API