Legal Opinion
Oakview Treatment Centers of Kansas, Inc. v. Garrett
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided June 24, 1999No. CIV. A. 98-2164-KHVPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
VRATIL, District Judgé.
Plaintiff Oakview Treatment Centers, Inc. (“Oakview”) brings suit to enforce an indemnity agreement, claiming that defendants have refused to pay. On June 14 and 15, 1999, Oakview tried its case to the Court. For reasons set forth more fully below, the Court finds that Oakview is entitled to judgment in this case.
Findings of Fact
Consistent with the evidence presented at trial, which consisted primarily of stipulations, the Court makes the following findings of fact.
In early 1991, James Garrett and Bonita Garrett were the sole owners of Garrett &…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Fontenot v. Mesa Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- Hamilton v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1998
- Lightcap v. Mobil Oil CorporationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1977
- Missouri Pacific Railroad Company v. Kansas Gas and Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Terry Neustrom v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, Defendant-Third-Party v. Asplundh Tree Expert Company, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Flint Hills Resources Alaska, LLC v. Williams Alaska Petroleum, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2016
- Perry Drug Stores v. NP Holding Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007