Legal Opinion

In the Matter Of: Estaste of Benedict

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided November 14, 1934PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On Motion to Assess Damages for Frivolous Appeal

2Per curiam

This motion was filed under Section 4639, C. G. L., 2920 R. G. S., and 4965 C. G. L., 3173 R. G. S., which sections vest in the Supreme Court power to quash proceedings in error and to dismiss appeals as frivolous where they are taken against good faith and merely for delay, and to decree damages thereon against the appellant in a sum not exceeding ten per cent, where the circumstances warrant it.

The cause below was a suit for an accounting by two of the heirs at law of William H. Benedict, deceased. In that suit a final decree was rendered in…

3Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dzialynski v. Bank of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of Florida · 1887
  2. Williams v. LaPenotiereSupreme Court of Florida · 1889
  3. Redmond v. W. M. Donaldson & Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1895
  4. Stafford v. AndersSupreme Court of Florida · 1860
  5. Richards v. NallSupreme Court of Florida · 1859

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gill v. SmithSupreme Court of Florida · 1935
  2. Dunscombe v. SayleSupreme Court of Florida · 1961
  3. Nautilus Operating Co. v. Donald S. Lavigne, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API