Legal Opinion
Williams v. Olivo
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)
Decided November 16, 1995No. 04-93-00549-CVPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON APPELLEES’ MOTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC AND APPELLANT CLAYTON W. WILLIAMS, JR., INC.’S MOTION FOR REHEARING
CHAPA, Chief Justice.
Appellees’ motion for rehearing en bane is granted. This renders moot appellees’ motion for rehearing addressed to the original panel. Appellant Clayton W. Williams, Jr., Inc’s motion for rehearing was considered en banc on the court’s own motion; that motion for rehearing is also granted. The previous opinions and judgment dated November 8, 1995, are withdrawn and the following opinions and judgment are substituted therefor.
Appellants, Clayton W. Williams, Jr.,…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- Cain v. BainTexas Supreme Court · 1986
- Garza v. AlviarTexas Supreme Court · 1965
- Pool v. Ford Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
- Transportation Insurance Co. v. MorielTexas Supreme Court · 1994
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Clayton W. Williams, Jr., Inc. v. OlivoTexas Supreme Court · 1997
- Wohlfahrt v. Holloway, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2005
- Maritime Overseas Corp. v. EllisTexas Supreme Court · 1996
- Clayton W. Williams, Jr., Inc. v. OlivoTexas Supreme Court · 1997
- John H. Holloway v. Douglas Wohlfahrt, M.D. and Lynn Wohlfahrt, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.