Legal Opinion

Rosario v. Bronx Park South III Associates, L.P.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 1, 2011PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Defendant’s evidence established prima facie that it had no constructive notice of the alleged wet condition that caused plaintiff to slip and fall. In opposition, plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact. The assertion of the injured plaintiff’s husband that he had observed water accumulate in the lobby of defendant’s building when it rained, including on the date of plaintiffs accident, raised no more than a general awareness that the floor became wet during inclement weather, which is insufficient to establish constructive notice of the specific condition causing her injury (see…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Solazzo v. New York City Transit AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. Rodriguez v. 520 Audubon AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hart v. 210 W. 77 St. LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API