Legal Opinion

People v. O'CONNOR

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided January 22, 1953No. 32434, 32583, 32586PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice HershEy

These three cases are consolidated for hearing and opinion in this court because the same questions of law and fact are involved in all of them. They are brought here by the same attorneys and on substantially the same briefs and records.

In each one of these cases an information was filed in the municipal court of Chicago charging the plaintiff in error with a violation of the Uniform Narcotics Drug Act, by unlawfully having in his possession a - certain habit-forming drug called heroin. Each defendant was represented by counsel. Robert O’Connor and Fred De Paulo pleaded not guilty and waived…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. CosperIllinois Supreme Court · 1950

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. DoyleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
  2. People v. DabneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  3. People v. DabneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. People v. BoydenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1955
  5. People v. O'CONNORIllinois Supreme Court · 1954

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API