Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Kiley v. Coveney

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 27, 1981Published

1Concurrence

Gulotta, J.,

concurs on constraint of Matter of Cherry v Hayduk (49 AD2d 934) and Matter of Smith v McNab (35 AD2d 744), in accordance with the following memorandum, in which Mangano, J., concurs. Were we writing upon a clean slate, we would be inclined to adopt the view expressed by Justice Benjamin in his dissent in Matter of Smith v McNab (supra), and hold that section 7-104 (formerly § 248) of the Election Law does not require the exclusion from the Independence Party line of the petitioner’s name as a candidate for the office of District Court Judge in Suffolk County merely because he is…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Matter of Crane v. VoorhisNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  2. Matter of Callaghan v. VoorhisNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  3. Battista v. PowerNew York Court of Appeals · 1965
  4. General Cherry v. HaydukAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  5. Smith v. McNabAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API