Legal Opinion
Woodman v. Rowe
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided December 5, 1879PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtDoe, C. J.
The plaintiff’s guardian or next friend could be made a party by an amendment relating back to the commencement of the suit. But the plaintiff being now of age, an amendment is not necessary.
The parties are bound by their settlement of the estate without administration. Hibbard v. Kent, 15 N. H. 516; Clarke v. Clay, 31 N. H. 393; Ceorge v. Johnson, 45 N. H. 456; Mercer v. Pike, 58 N. H. 286.
Bemurrer overruled.
Allen, J., did not sit: the others concurred.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Mercer v. PikeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1878
3Cited by1 opinion
- Paju Ex Rel. Paju v. RickerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1970