Legal Opinion

Brewster v. Hodges & Peck

The Superior Court of New York City

Decided October 29, 1852PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The questions raised turned upon the proper construction of § 219 of the Code, and the judges consulted by Campbell, J,, were all of opinion that, upon a motion to dissolve an injunction *610order granted during the pendency of an action under the last clause of that section, the only question to be considered is, that of fraudulent intent. Affidavits denying the debt sworn to by the plaintiff, cannot properly be received. They were also of opinion, that the effect of the temporary injunction, that can alone be properly granted in such a case, is not to restrain any removal or disposition…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ross v. BedellThe Superior Court of New York City · 1856

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API