Manning v. State ex rel. Wyoming Worker's Compensation Division
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partThomas, Justice
I agree that the office of hearing examiners had no jurisdiction to appoint an attorney for Manning. Indeed, that is the point of my dissenting opinion in Painter v. State ex rel. Wyoming Worker’s Compensation Div., 931 P.2d 953, 956 (Wyo.1997). I am still of the persuasion that the office of hearing examiners lacks jurisdiction to appoint counsel in the absence of a request by an interested party and the referral by the Division for a contested case hearing. Clearly, this instance is outside the authority of the office of hearing examiners to appoint an attorney.
I dissent from that portion…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lo Sasso v. BraunWyoming Supreme Court · 1963
- State Ex Rel. Morrison v. AnwayArizona Supreme Court · 1960
- Workers' Compensation Claim of Jackson v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1990
- Union Pacific Resources Co. v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
- Tri County Telephone Ass'n v. Wyoming Public Service CommissionWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.