Legal Opinion
Doe v. State
New York Court of Claims
Decided August 6, 1993No. Claim No. 82265PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Israel Margolis, J.
Claimants move pursuant to CPLR 5044 for an order requir*84ing that all the outstanding payments under the CPLR article 50-B structured judgment herein be accelerated in a lump sum without reduction to present value and be immediately due and payable, because the defendant tendered payment of its first installment of $43,471.12 due under the second amended judgment herein on July 7 rather than July 1, 1993. On June 15, the defendant contracted with Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (Metropolitan) to pay the future periodic installments, including the July…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Doe v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Frey v. Chester E. Smith & Sons, Inc.District Court, N.D. New York · 1990
- Doe v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1992
- Lieberman v. Perez-VeridianoNew York Supreme Court · 1988
3Cited by4 opinions
- Damiano v. Exide Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Uderitz v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1997
- Stewart v. New York City Transit AuthorityNew York Supreme Court · 2015
- Summerville v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001