Legal Opinion
City of Pasadena v. State of California
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 26, 1993No. B057370PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
EPSTEIN, Acting P. J.
This appeal arises from a heated public debate about the placement of a parole office in the San Gabriel Valley by the State of California (the State) Department of Corrections (the Department). Responding to complaints from citizens of Alhambra and Monterey Park, the State agreed to relocate a parole office from that area to the Pasadena area. The State selected a site in an existing office building in the Pasadena Civic Center. It determined that its lease of the building was exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Public…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Friends of Mammoth v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- No Oil, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Denis Hanly v. Richard G. Kleindienst, as Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- Metropolitan Edison Co. v. People Against Nuclear EnergySupreme Court of the United States · 1983
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Western States Petroleum Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Berkeley Hillside Preservation v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
- Bakersfield Citizens for Local Control v. City of BakersfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Azusa Land Reclamation Co. v. Main San Gabriel Basin WatermasterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Banker's Hill, Hillcrest, Park West Community Preservation Group v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.