Legal Opinion

People v. Perez

New York County Courts

Decided July 2, 1962PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNathan R. Sobel, J.

In addition to other issues decided during the course of the hearing on this motion to suppress, an issue is raised which has become quite commonplace in the substantive law of search and seizure. It concerns “ latecomers ” into the searched premises.

In the instant case a dozen police officers, under the authority of a search warrant, entered the private premises. They remained for several hours during which period, and at various times, eight other defendants entered the premises and were arrested and searched.

The law of “ latecomers ” is in the same area as the law of “ bystanders ”, To…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Henry v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. United States v. Di ReSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Giordenello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Byars v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  5. Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. NeulistAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
  2. People v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API