Legal Opinion

The Huntington National Bank v. Watters

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 30, 2017No. Case 2D16-3347; 2D16-4042PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRENSHAW, Judge.

Because the trial court erred in finding that Huntington National Bank’s (Huntington) attempt to foreclose on Warren Watters’s property was barred by the statute of limitations, we reverse.

On February 24, 2015, Huntington initiated a second action to foreclose on Watters’s property, alleging the same default dates indicated in the first action, 1 “August 1, 2007, and all subsequent payments.” In his answer, Watters asserted numerous affirmative defenses, including that the statute of limitations had run in 2012. The trial court granted final summary judgment for Watters,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bollettieri Resort Villas Condominium Association, Inc. v. The Bank of New York MellonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
  2. Desylvester v. The Bank of New York MellonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. PHH Mortg. Corp. v. ParishDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
  2. U. S. BANK, N. A., SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE v. ANA GONZALEZDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API