Legal Opinion

(HC) Lively v. Peery

District Court, E.D. California

Decided December 6, 2021No. 2:21-cv-02203Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ERIC J. LIVELY, No. 2:21-cv-2203 AC P 12 Petitioner, 13 v. ORDER 14 S. PEERY, 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a petition for a writ of habeas 18 corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 19 A petitioner may seek federal habeas relief from a state-court conviction or sentence “only 20 on the ground that he is in custody in violation of the Constitution or laws or treaties of the United 21 States.” 28 U.S.C. § 2254(a). Although the pleading is styled as a § 2254…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Taylor v. ListCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  3. John Colwell v. Robert BannisterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  4. Cornwell Entertainment, Inc. v. Anchin, Block & Anchin, LLPCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API