Legal Opinion
Mosca v. Normile
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 13, 2000PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Plaintiff commenced this legal malpractice and breach of contract action after discovering that residential property he had purchased did not have “deeded lake rights.” Defendants met their initial burden by establishing that no act or omission on their part was the proximate cause of any damages incurred by plaintiff with respect to both the legal malpractice (see, Marquez v Ross Dev., 162 AD2d 1011) and the breach of contract causes of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Drummer v. Valeron Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Canavan v. SteenburgAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Mosca v. KinerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Marquez v. J. Ross DevelopmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Massena Towne Center Associates v. Sear-Brown Group, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
3Cited by3 opinions
- Goldfarb v. SchwartzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Parkison v. KBM Mgt., Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
- Winkley v. KBM Mgt., Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022