Carringer v. Taylor
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Concurrence
CIRILLO, President Judge,
concurring and dissenting.
Because Taylor has failed to produce any evidence that the unimproved dirt road was ever a public road under *208section 2781 or section 2735, I, like the majority, would affirm the entry of summary judgment in favor of Carringer. See 36 Pa.S. §§ 2781 & 2735. Moreover, I also agree with the majority’s finding that Taylor’s failure to plead his quiet title action as a separate count of his counterclaim in equity operates as a waiver of that cause of action at law. The majority has also, in my opinion, correctly disposed of Carringer’s contention…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Wm. Penn Parking Garage, Inc. v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Posternack v. Am. Cas. Co. of ReadingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Bata v. Central-Penn National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Del Turco v. Peoples Home Savings Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Laursen v. GENERAL HOSP. OF MONROE CTY.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.