Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Carringer v. Taylor

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 18, 1990No. 1467, 1628 and 1629Published

1Concurrence

CIRILLO, President Judge,

concurring and dissenting.

Because Taylor has failed to produce any evidence that the unimproved dirt road was ever a public road under *208section 2781 or section 2735, I, like the majority, would affirm the entry of summary judgment in favor of Carringer. See 36 Pa.S. §§ 2781 & 2735. Moreover, I also agree with the majority’s finding that Taylor’s failure to plead his quiet title action as a separate count of his counterclaim in equity operates as a waiver of that cause of action at law. The majority has also, in my opinion, correctly disposed of Carringer’s contention…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Wm. Penn Parking Garage, Inc. v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Posternack v. Am. Cas. Co. of ReadingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  3. Bata v. Central-Penn National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  4. Del Turco v. Peoples Home Savings Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Laursen v. GENERAL HOSP. OF MONROE CTY.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API