Legal Opinion

Self v. Cordell

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided January 15, 1870PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Appeal from. Fourth District Court.

1Opinion of the CourtWagner, Judge

In this case no bill of exceptions is preserved in the record, and therefore there is nothing to review in this court except what may appear on the face of the record. The action was for damages for the violation of a contract, and alleged that the plaintiff purchased of the defendant a certain carding machine, and paid the purchase money, the defendant at the same time delivering the possession. As a part of the agreement, the defendant bound himself not to set up or superintend the running *346of any other carding machine in the vicinity of the one sold to the plaintiff, or near enough to be in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Suggett's Administrator v. Cason's AdministratorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1858
  2. Blanton v. KnoxSupreme Court of Missouri · 1834

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. McKinnon v. McKinnonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1893
  2. Bless v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895
  3. Blue Valley Creamery Co. v. Consolidated Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936
  4. Reigart v. Manufacturers Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1909
  5. Winters v. CherrySupreme Court of Missouri · 1883

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API