Legal Opinion

Seawell v. Beeler

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1956PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Neil

The complainants filed their original bill in the Chancery Court at Nashville seeking a declaratory judgment, complaining that they are being deprived of a valuable personal and property right resulting from the enforcement of Chapter 113 of the Public Acts of 1953. The bill alleges that the Act is unconstitutional as violating Article 1, Section 8, and Article 11, Section 8 of the Constitution of Tennessee; and Section 1 of the 14th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.

Article 1, Section 8, provides:

“That no man shall be taken or imprisoned, or disseized of his freehold,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Saunders v. SwannTennessee Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Block Coal & Coke Corp. v. CaseTennessee Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Short v. State Licensing Board for the Healing ArtsTennessee Supreme Court · 1952

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Estrin v. MossTennessee Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Estrin v. MossTennessee Supreme Court · 1968
  3. In the Matter of the Estate of S.W. BrindleyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API