Legal Opinion

Dailey v. SRA Foods, Inc.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 29, 2004No. 1030450Published

1Opinion of the Court

SEE, Justice.

Judge Robert Vance, Jr., petitions this Court for a writ of mandamus directing the Court of Civil Appeals to set aside its writ of mandamus ordering Judge Vance to make a judgment final pursuant to Rule 54(b), Ala. R. Civ, P. We grant the petition and issue the writ.

I

Roderick Dailey sued SRA Foods, Inc. (“SRA”), in the Jefferson Circuit Court alleging retaliatory-discharge and seeking workers’ compensation benefits. Judge Vance held a bench trial on Dailey’s workers’ compensation claim. At the close of the bench trial, Judge Vance issued an order postponing judgment on the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Ocwen Federal Bank, FSBSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  2. Ex Parte Dorsey Trailers, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  3. Branch v. Southtrust Bank of Dothan, N.A.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  4. Ex Parte ShowersSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  5. Ex Parte Ben-Acadia, Ltd.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1990

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API