Legal Opinion
Peters v. Woodbury County
District Court, N.D. Iowa
Decided June 20, 2013No. Nos. C12-4070-MWB, C12-4042-MWBPublished
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
LEONARD T. STRAND, United States Magistrate Judge.
The plaintiffs in these separate civil cases have filed motions to consolidate them for discovery and trial. See Doc. No. 32 in Case No. 12-4070 (hereafter, the “Peters case”); Doc. No. 41 in Case No. 12-4042 (hereafter, the “Clay ease”). The defendants in both cases have filed resistances. See Doc. Nos. 33 and 36 in the Peters case; Doc. Nos. 42 and 43 in the Clay case. The issues have been thoroughly briefed by the parties and I therefore find that oral argument is not necessary. See Local Rule 7(c). The motions are fully submitted.
BACKG…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Johnson v. Manhattan Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Aubrey Hendrix v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- Doug Brady, Inc. v. New Jersey Building Laborers Statewide FundsDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2008
- Cantrell v. GAF Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- Enterprise Bank v. Gustave J. Saettele Laura Saettele, Landmark Bank of St. Charles County v. Gustave J. Saettele Laura SaetteleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.