Legal Opinion

Kinner v. Shepard

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut

Decided March 19, 1901No. 793PublishedCited by 1 opinion

In Equity. Suit for infringement of patents. On exceptions to report of master.

1Opinion of the Court

TOWNSEND, District Judge.

Complainant’s first exception is to the mode of computation adopted by the master. He says the master should have taken 241,888 dozen hoops at defendant George A. Shepard’s estimated cost of $.09732 per dozen, making $23,540.54, and added to it the profit of $14.34, admitted by defendants’ counsel in bis brief, and therefrom deduce a selling price of $23,554.88, and from' this deduct the master’s estimated cost of $8,829.95, leaving $14,724.93 as defendants’ profits. But the $14.34 profits admitted by defendants’ counsel omit many items of cost included by defendant…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Yale Lock Manufacturing Co. v. SargentSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Covert v. SargentU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1889
  3. Hall v. SternU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1884

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Pressed Prism Glass Co. v. Continuous Glass Prism Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API