Ramsey v. Quillen
Tennessee Supreme Court
EROM HANCOCK. Appeal from the Chancery Court at Sneedville. H. C. Smith, Ch.
1Opinion of the CourtFreeman, J.
Complainants are creditors, by decree of this court, rendered in 1875, of respondent A. C. Quillen. This *185decree is founded on an indebtedness, alleged in the bill, which existed before the war, evidenced by promissory notes. These notes, it is charged, had been wrongfully obtained by A. C. Quillen, and the bill, on which the decree mentioned was had, was filed • in October, 18M, to assert that fact, and have a decree for the amount due on said notes, they being in possession of the payor.
On the 2d day of July, 1866, A. C. Quillen, the father, made a conveyance of the tract of land now in…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Akers v. GillentineCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1950
- Hatch v. LusignanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
- Hallack v. HawkinsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1969
- Paris v. Walker (In re Walker)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2017
- Hallack v. HawkinsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.