Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Hooper

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided June 23, 1975No. Docket 18524Published

1Dissent

*184D. E. Holbrook, Jr., J.

(dissenting). Due to the testimony at the Walker hearing,1 I am compelled to dissent on the issue of the admission at trial of the defendant’s statement.

During the hearing, there was testimony indicating the following sequence of events: (1) the defendant was taken into police custody around 1 a.m. on July 25, 1972, and processed through the normal booking routine; (2) the arresting officer advised the defendant of his rights under Miranda v Arizona, 384 US 436; 86 S Ct 1602; 16 L Ed 2d 694 (1966), immediately after the arrest while conveying the defendant to the police…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. People v. WalkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
  4. People v. RobinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
  5. People v. McGillenMichigan Supreme Court · 1974

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API