Legal Opinion
Wright v. Leupp
New Jersey Court of Chancery
Decided December 15, 1905PublishedCited by 9 opinions
On final hearing on bill, answer and agreed statement of facts.
1Opinion of the Court
Pitney, Y. C.
The complainant Wright is the administrator, appointed by the surrogate of the city of Few York, of Hetty McFarland Furniss, deceased, who was the wife of the defendant William P. Furniss.
His standing in this court is acquired by having filed in the proper office a copy of his letters of administration.
The complainants, Clinton Furniss and Ruth Furniss, are the children of the deceased Hetty and the said William P. Furniss.
The defendant Leupp is the substituted trustee under a deed of trust made by the defendant William P. Furniss and his sister, Grace Livingston Furniss, then…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Kopack v. PolzerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949
- Commonwealth v. ReckefusSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Blumenthal v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1936
- Greenwood v. GreenwoodSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1915
- In re the Estate of RandolphNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.