Welch v. State

Although the testimony of witnesses for the State contained seeming or actual contradictions, yet the jury having nevertheless believed the witnesses, and their testimony being sufficient, if true, to authorize a conviction, there was no abuse of discretion in denying h new trial. Davis v. State, 94 Ga. 399 (19 S. E. 243); Clements v. State, 159 Ga. 425 (125 S. E. 800); Laseter v. State, 52 Ga. App. 261 (2) (183 S. E. 76). Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and, Guerry, J., concur.