Legal Opinion

Corinne Mill Canal & Stock Co. v. Johnson

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1891Published

Appeal from a judgment upon verdict of the district court of the first district and from an order refusing a new trial. The opinion states the facts except the following which appear in the record.

Read the full summary

Appeal from a judgment upon verdict of the district court of the first district and from an order refusing a new trial. The opinion states the facts except the following which appear in the record. There was evidence tending to show that there were no mineral lands in the land in controversy, and no evidence to the contrary so far as the record discloses, and the plaintiff offered in evidence as admissions of the defendant the defendant’s sworn cross complaint, alleging title in the railroad company, and a recognition of that title by the defendant. It was admitted on the trial that all the…

1Opinion of the Court

AndeRSON, J.:

This is an action by the plaintiff to recover possession of the following described real estate situated in Box Elder county, to-wit: Section 5, township 11, K\, of range 3 "W.; sections 17, 19, 21, and 29, in township 12 N., of range 3 W.; the W. § of section 33, and the SW. ^ of section 15, in township 12 M"., of range 3 "W., Salt Lake meridian. The complaint alleges that plaintiff was, on the 8th day of June, 1883, the owner, and in possession, and entitled to the possession of said real estate, and that on said day the defendant unlawfully and wrongfully took possession of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Tarpey v. Deseret Salt Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1888

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API