Legal Opinion

Macon, Dublin & Savannah Railroad v. Yesbik

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 9, 1913No. 4963Published

Action for damages; from city court of Dublin — Judge Hicks. May 19, 1913.

1Opinion of the CourtPottle, J.

1. It is no ground for rejecting answers to interrogatories that one set of questions was propounded to two witnesses, each of whom made separate answers to, the interrogatories.

2. All of the other questions made in the record were settled adversely to the plaintiff in error when the case was before this court at a previous term. Yesbik v. Macon, Dublin & Savannah R. Co., 11 Ga. App. 298 (75 S. E. 207). There is no evidence in the present record that the damage to the goods resulted from a compliance by the initial carrier with instructions given by the shipper. The evidence demanded the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Yesbik v. Macon, Dublin & Savannah RailroadCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API