Nocero v. Denitto
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Davis, J.:
The action is brought by plaintiff to recover a balance alleged to be due for labor and materials furnished defendants in the summer of 1923 in making alterations and additions to a house owned and occupied by them.
The parties agree there was no written plan or specifications • covering the improvements to be made. Nor is there substantial dispute that the value of the labor and materials is the amount plaintiff claims, to wit, $2,269.77. The parties differ primarily on the question of whether there was an express contract to do the work at a price fixed in advance. The plaintiff…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Sheehan v. CoffeyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
- Hurley v. Metropolitan Street RailwayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bond Street Knitters, Inc. v. Peninsula National BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1943
- Federal Concrete Co. v. MineoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
- Zamenick v. Easman & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936