Legal Opinion

Nocero v. Denitto

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 11, 1925PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Davis, J.:

The action is brought by plaintiff to recover a balance alleged to be due for labor and materials furnished defendants in the summer of 1923 in making alterations and additions to a house owned and occupied by them.

The parties agree there was no written plan or specifications • covering the improvements to be made. Nor is there substantial dispute that the value of the labor and materials is the amount plaintiff claims, to wit, $2,269.77. The parties differ primarily on the question of whether there was an express contract to do the work at a price fixed in advance. The plaintiff…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sheehan v. CoffeyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
  2. Hurley v. Metropolitan Street RailwayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bond Street Knitters, Inc. v. Peninsula National BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1943
  2. Federal Concrete Co. v. MineoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
  3. Zamenick v. Easman & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API